McDonald v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
This text of 74 S.E.2d 918 (McDonald v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is a workmen’s compensation case and is here on appeal from an order reversing and setting aside an award in favor of appellant made by the Industrial Commission. This well considered order, which clearly and concisely states the facts and issues involved, is, for the reasons therein stated, adopted and will be reported as the opinion of this Court.
We desire to add that notwithstanding the fact that our own decisions fully sustain the conclusion of the Court below, we have carefully considered the cases from other jurisdictions cited in the splendid brief of appellant’s counsel, as well as a number found in our own research. It must be conceded that the language and tone of several of them, al[224]*224though presenting somewhat different factual situations, tend to sustain the contention of appellant, but we think the weight of authority elsewhere is to the contrary. Among the cases from other jurisdictions denying compensation under circumstances strikingly similar to those involved in the instant case are the following: Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & Associates, 222 N. C. 724, 24 S. E. (2d) 751; Dinsmore’s Case, 143 Me. 344, 62 A. (2d) 205; and Treasurer of State of Michigan v. Kaiser-Frazer Corporation, 326 Mich. 715, 40 N. W. (2d) 776.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 S.E.2d 918, 223 S.C. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-e-i-dupont-de-nemours-co-sc-1953.