McDonald v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.

74 S.E.2d 918, 223 S.C. 217
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMarch 4, 1953
Docket16724
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 74 S.E.2d 918 (McDonald v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McDonald v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co., 74 S.E.2d 918, 223 S.C. 217 (S.C. 1953).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is a workmen’s compensation case and is here on appeal from an order reversing and setting aside an award in favor of appellant made by the Industrial Commission. This well considered order, which clearly and concisely states the facts and issues involved, is, for the reasons therein stated, adopted and will be reported as the opinion of this Court.

We desire to add that notwithstanding the fact that our own decisions fully sustain the conclusion of the Court below, we have carefully considered the cases from other jurisdictions cited in the splendid brief of appellant’s counsel, as well as a number found in our own research. It must be conceded that the language and tone of several of them, al[224]*224though presenting somewhat different factual situations, tend to sustain the contention of appellant, but we think the weight of authority elsewhere is to the contrary. Among the cases from other jurisdictions denying compensation under circumstances strikingly similar to those involved in the instant case are the following: Bryan v. T. A. Loving Co. & Associates, 222 N. C. 724, 24 S. E. (2d) 751; Dinsmore’s Case, 143 Me. 344, 62 A. (2d) 205; and Treasurer of State of Michigan v. Kaiser-Frazer Corporation, 326 Mich. 715, 40 N. W. (2d) 776.

Affirmed.

Baker, C. J., and Fishburne, Stukes, Taylor, and Oxner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregg v. Dorchester County School System
241 S.E.2d 554 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1978)
Sola v. Sunny Slope Farms
135 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1964)
Department of Correction v. Harris
192 A.2d 479 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1963)
Baldwin v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.
108 S.E.2d 409 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1959)
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Company, Inc. v. Leo Hall
237 F.2d 145 (Fourth Circuit, 1956)
Sylvan v. Sylvan Bros., Inc.
82 S.E.2d 794 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1954)
TROUTMAN v. Williams Furniture Corp.
79 S.E.2d 374 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)
McDonald v. EI DU PONT & CO.
74 S.E.2d 918 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 S.E.2d 918, 223 S.C. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdonald-v-e-i-dupont-de-nemours-co-sc-1953.