McDevitt v. Salamone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McDevitt v. Salamone

245 A.D.2d 456, 666 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13096

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 456 (McDevitt v. Salamone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDevitt v. Salamone, 245 A.D.2d 456, 666 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered February 22, 1995, which, after a hearing, granted the application of the petitioner father to transfer custody of the parties’ child from her to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court weighed the appropriate factors and, thereupon, properly transferred custody of the child to the petitioner father. The record clearly supports the court’s conclusion that a transfer of custody to the father was in the child’s best interests (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167).

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Lewis, 69 NY2d 321, 325). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Joy and Lerner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Friedenberg, J.H.O.), entered February 22, 1995, which, after a hearing, granted the application of the petitioner father to transfer custody of the parties’ child from her to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court weighed the appropriate factors and, thereupon, properly transferred custody of the child to the petitioner father. The record clearly supports the court’s conclusion that a transfer of custody to the father was in the child’s best interests (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167).

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Lewis, 69 NY2d 321, 325). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Joy and Lerner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 456, 666 N.Y.S.2d 459, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdevitt-v-salamone-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack