Aull v. Aull

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aull v. Aull

251 A.D.2d 325, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6213

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 325 (Aull v. Aull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aull v. Aull, 251 A.D.2d 325, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Garvey, J.), dated May 7, 1996, as, after a hearing, granted the application of the petitioner father to transfer custody of the parties’ children from her to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The court weighed the appropriate factors and, thereupon, transferred custody of the children to the petitioner father. The record clearly supports the court’s determination that a transfer of custody to the father was in the best interests of the children (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89; Matter of McDevitt v Salamone, 245 AD2d 456). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Rockland County (Garvey, J.), dated May 7, 1996, as, after a hearing, granted the application of the petitioner father to transfer custody of the parties’ children from her to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The court weighed the appropriate factors and, thereupon, transferred custody of the children to the petitioner father. The record clearly supports the court’s determination that a transfer of custody to the father was in the best interests of the children (see, Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89; Matter of McDevitt v Salamone, 245 AD2d 456). O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 325, 673 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aull-v-aull-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack