McDavid v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McDavid v. State

790 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11907, 2001 WL 945837

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 22, 2001

DocketNo. 3D01-1045

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 790 So. 2d 1292 (McDavid v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McDavid v. State, 790 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11907, 2001 WL 945837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PARTIAL CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the State’s partial confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for the limited purpose of conforming the written sentence to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See State v. Jones, 753 So.2d 1276, 1277 n. 2 (Fla.2000).

Further, the defendant’s contention that he is entitled to resentencing under the 1994 guidelines, pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), lacks merit. A review of the record shows that the defendant entered into a voluntary plea for a specific term of imprisonment that is within the allowable 1994 guidelines range and that term was not conditioned upon the sentencing guidelines. See Heggs, 759 So.2d at 627; Carmona v. State, 763 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 776 So.2d 274 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARTIAL CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the State’s partial confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for the limited purpose of conforming the written sentence to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See State v. Jones, 753 So.2d 1276, 1277 n. 2 (Fla.2000).

Further, the defendant’s contention that he is entitled to resentencing under the 1994 guidelines, pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), lacks merit. A review of the record shows that the defendant entered into a voluntary plea for a specific term of imprisonment that is within the allowable 1994 guidelines range and that term was not conditioned upon the sentencing guidelines. See Heggs, 759 So.2d at 627; Carmona v. State, 763 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 776 So.2d 274 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded with directions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

790 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11907, 2001 WL 945837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcdavid-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack