McDavid v. State

790 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11907, 2001 WL 945837
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 2001·No. No. 3D01-1045·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PARTIAL CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the State’s partial confession of error, we reverse the defendant’s sentence and remand for the limited purpose of conforming the written sentence to the trial court’s oral pronouncements. See State v. Jones, 753 So.2d 1276, 1277 n. 2 (Fla.2000).

Further, the defendant’s contention that he is entitled to resentencing under the 1994 guidelines, pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), lacks merit. A review of the record shows that the defendant entered into a voluntary plea for a specific term of imprisonment that is within the allowable 1994 guidelines range and that term was not conditioned upon the sentencing guidelines. See Heggs, 759 So.2d at 627; Carmona v. State, 763 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 776 So.2d 274 (Fla.2000).

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McDavid v. State, 790 So. 2d 1292, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11907, 2001 WL 945837 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

790 So. 2d 1292 (McDavid v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G.R. v. State
127 So. 3d 832 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)