G.R. v. State
This text of 127 So. 3d 832 (G.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON PARTIAL CONFESSION OF ERROR
We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s decision to deny G.R.’s last minute motion for a continuance. See Mills v. State, 280 So.2d 35 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). We also find no error in the trial court’s order adjudicating G.R. delinquent [833]*833for fleeing from a police officer. However, based on the State’s proper partial confession of error, we reverse and remand for the limited purpose of conforming the written adjudicatory and disposition orders to the trial court’s oral pronouncement that adjudication be withheld. See McDavid v. State, 790 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 So. 3d 832, 2013 WL 6224035, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gr-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.