Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McCutcheon v. State

McCutcheon v. State

96 So. 3d 1091, 2012 WL 3822148, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14847
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 5, 2012
DocketNo. 4D10-4506
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 3d 1091 (McCutcheon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCutcheon v. State, 96 So. 3d 1091, 2012 WL 3822148, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14847 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions are affirmed. State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). The state concedes that a scrivener’s error occurred on appellant’s sentence in case number 09-10979CF10A when appellant was sentenced as a habitual offender on the grand theft count. For that reason, we remand with directions for the trial court to delete the habitual offender designation on appellant’s sentence for grand theft.

Affirmed, but remanded for correction of sentence.

GROSS, LEVINE, JJ., and ROSENBERG, ROBIN L„ Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 3d 1091, 2012 WL 3822148, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccutcheon-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.