McCUNNEY v. GARDNER
This text of 374 F.2d 110 (McCUNNEY v. GARDNER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Victoria McCUNNEY, Joan McCunney, Gwendolyn McCunney and
Patricia McCunney by Anna McCunney, Appellants,
v.
John W. GARDNER, Secretary of the Department of Health,
Education and Welfare.
No. 16115.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Feb. 7, 1967.
Decided Feb. 24, 1967.
Martin J. Resnick, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
Merna B. Marshall, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J. T. O'Keefe, U.S.Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before HASTIE, FORMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The appellant is an unsuccessful claimant of social security benefits for her children. The district court granted summary judgment denying the claimant judicial relief. The record shows that the claimant did not within the time required by law take the prescribed steps to obtain a full administrative hearing upon or review of the merits of her claim. Thereafter, the appellee's denial of a subsequent petition to reopen the matter was not an appealable order. Filice v. Celebrezze, 9th Cir., 1963, 319 F.2d 443. In the circumstances the courts cannot properly assist her.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
374 F.2d 110, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccunney-v-gardner-ca3-1967.