McCullough v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2009·No. 13-1676·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1230

GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE W. BUSH, JR.; RICHARD B. CHENEY; NANCY PELOSI; JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.; US PERSONS, thereof,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-04137-GRA)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George C. McCullough, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George C. McCullough appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. McCullough v. United States, No. 8:08-cv-04137-

GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCullough v. United States, (4th Cir. 2009).

McCullough v. United States (McCullough v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related