McCullough v. United States
This text of McCullough v. United States (McCullough v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1230
GEORGE C. MCCULLOUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GEORGE W. BUSH, JR.; RICHARD B. CHENEY; NANCY PELOSI; JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.; US PERSONS, thereof,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:08-cv-04137-GRA)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George C. McCullough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
George C. McCullough appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. McCullough v. United States, No. 8:08-cv-04137-
GRA (D.S.C. Feb. 13, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCullough v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullough-v-united-states-ca4-2009.