McCrudden v. Putnam Valley Central School District
This text of 88 A.D.3d 721 (McCrudden v. Putnam Valley Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[722]*722Since an award of an attorney’s fee was not authorized by an agreement between the parties, by statute, or by Court rule, the Supreme Court improperly awarded an attorney’s fee to the petitioner (see U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v City Club Hotel, LLC, 3 NY3d 592 [2004]; Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 NY2d 487, 491 [1989]; Matter of Gargano v City of N.Y. Dept. of Fin., 26 AD3d 329 [2006]). Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Cohen, JJ, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
88 A.D.3d 721, 930 N.Y.2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccrudden-v-putnam-valley-central-school-district-nyappdiv-2011.