McCreesh v. City of Philadelphia
850 A.2d 629, 578 Pa. 192, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1028
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCreesh v. City of Philadelphia. Read the opinion of the Court — 585 Pa. 211 →
Opinion
[193]*193 ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of June 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:
Whether, in light of Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa. 465, 366 A.2d 882 (1976) and its progeny, a plaintiff should be permitted to have a writ of summons reissued when that writ was originally filed prior to the running of the statute of limitations but ineffectively served?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCreesh v. City of Philadelphia, 850 A.2d 629, 578 Pa. 192, 2004 Pa. LEXIS 1028 (Pa. 2004).
850 A.2d 629 (McCreesh v. City of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lamp v. Heyman
366 A.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)