McCreesh v. City of Philadelphia

850 A.2d 629
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 2, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 850 A.2d 629 (McCreesh v. City of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCreesh v. City of Philadelphia, 850 A.2d 629 (Pa. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issue:

Whether, in light of Lamp v. Heyman, 469 Pa. 465, 366 A.2d 882 (1976) and its progeny, a plaintiff should be permitted to have a writ of summons reissued when that writ was originally filed prior to the running of the statute of limitations but ineffectively served?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamp v. Heyman
366 A.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
850 A.2d 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccreesh-v-city-of-philadelphia-pa-2004.