McCreary v. O'Flinn

63 Miss. 204
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 63 Miss. 204 (McCreary v. O'Flinn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCreary v. O'Flinn, 63 Miss. 204 (Mich. 1885).

Opinion

Arnold, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The writ of certiorari was properly quashed in this case.

It is the common law rule, as announced by this court in Deberry v. The President and Selectmen of Holly Springs, 35 Miss. 385, that none but parties to the record or proceedings sought -to be reviewed can prosecute or maintain a writ of certiorari. The rule is not changed by statute.

Appellants were not parties to the record, nor signers of a counter petition against the issuance of license to appellee, nor signers of a general petition against the granting of license to any person which had been disregarded by the mayor and selectmen, nor had they, as far as the record shows, made any objection before the mayor and selectmen to the granting of license to appellee, and consequently they were not so connected with the proceedings as to enable them to invoke the aid of the common law writ of certiorari.

A firmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carr v. Washington & Old Dominion Railway
44 App. D.C. 533 (D.C. Circuit, 1916)
Thornton v. Town of Charleston
68 So. 169 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1915)
McCullough v. Blackwell
51 Ark. 159 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1888)
Town Council v. Sargent
64 Miss. 621 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1887)
McCrary v. Sands
1 Miss. Dec. 226 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Miss. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccreary-v-oflinn-miss-1885.