McCreary v. Casey

45 Cal. 128
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1872·No. No. 3,427·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

It appearing in the record here to be conceded as a fact that in the action of Casey v. McCreary the equitable defense interposed by the latter was virtually dismissed with out being presented to or considered by the Court in rendering the judgment on that case, the judgment so rendered is not a bar to this action; the Court below therefore did not err in granting a new trial, and (without expressing an opinion as to the sufficiency of the complaint—a question which though argued by counsel is not involved in the appeal) the order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCreary v. Casey, 45 Cal. 128 (Cal. 1872).

45 Cal. 128 (McCreary v. Casey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kester v. McNear
271 P. 1083 (California Supreme Court, 1928)
Board of Trustees v. Whalen
41 P. 849 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)
Lord v. Dunster
21 P. 865 (California Supreme Court, 1889)
Witte v. Lockwood
39 Ohio St. (N.S.) 141 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1883)