McCoy v. State
664 So. 2d 17, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11697, 1995 WL 654480
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCoy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 639 So. 2d 163 →
Opinion
Based upon our review of the record, we find appellant’s argument that his written judgment and sentence as a habitual offender did not conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence to be wholly without merit. The trial court’s denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence therefore was not error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCoy v. State, 664 So. 2d 17, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11697, 1995 WL 654480 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
664 So. 2d 17 (McCoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.