McCoy v. Remington Rand, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCoy v. Remington Rand, Inc.

262 A.D. 790, 27 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5861

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 7, 1941·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held that claimant was entitled to be credited with so much of back pay, awarded to him by the National Labor Relations Board, which represents the amount of his earnings during the first and second quarter of 1938. The sole question involved is whether moneys paid, pursuant to an order of the National Labor Relations Board directing reinstatement of an employee with back pay, constitute remuneration and wages within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, §§500-539). It has been so held. (Matter of Tonra, 258 App. Div. 835; affd., 283 N. Y. 676.) We think the distinction sought to be made on the basis that in the Tonra case the moneys were paid pursuant to stipulation instead of by order, as in the present case, is without merit. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Industrial Commissioner. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held that claimant was entitled to be credited with so much of back pay, awarded to him by the National Labor Relations Board, which represents the amount of his earnings during the first and second quarter of 1938. The sole question involved is whether moneys paid, pursuant to an order of the National Labor Relations Board directing reinstatement of an employee with back pay, constitute remuneration and wages within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, §§500-539). It has been so held. (Matter of Tonra, 258 App. Div. 835; affd., 283 N. Y. 676.) We think the distinction sought to be made on the basis that in the Tonra case the moneys were paid pursuant to stipulation instead of by order, as in the present case, is without merit. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Industrial Commissioner. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur.

McCoy v. Remington Rand, Inc., 262 A.D. 790, 27 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 790 (McCoy v. Remington Rand, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related