In re Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Tonra

258 A.D. 835, 15 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1939·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

This is an appeal by the Robins Dry Dock & Repair Company, employer, appellant, from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirming the decision of the claims reviewer holding that all money paid by the appellant pursuant to a stipulation in settlement of all claims of the claimant for “ back wages ” covering the period following a labor dispute during which claimant herein was without employment, constitutes “ wages ” as defined in the Unemployment Insurance Law. The evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present —■ Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Tonra, 258 A.D. 835, 15 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

258 A.D. 835 (In re Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law Made by Tonra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Hernandez
97 A.D.2d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Hiserote Homes, Inc. v. Riedemann
277 N.W.2d 911 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1979)
Griggs v. Sands
526 S.W.2d 441 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1975)
Social Security Board v. Nierotko
327 U.S. 358 (Supreme Court, 1946)
McCoy v. Remington Rand, Inc.
262 A.D. 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)