McCoy v. Eddins
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 12-NOV-2020 01:10 PM Dkt. 8 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
ISAIAH W. MCCOY, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE TODD W. EDDINS, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,
and
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kuriyama, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of petitioner Isaiah W. McCoy’s
petition for writ of mandamus, filed on November 4, 2020, the
documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and
the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that
he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief,
that he lacks alternative means to seek relief, or that the
respondent judge exceeded his jurisdiction or committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion in denying the motion
for recusal. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982
P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary
remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a
clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative
means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the
requested action; where a court has discretion to act, mandamus
will not lie to interfere with or control the exercise of that
discretion, even when the judge has acted erroneously, unless the
judge has exceeded his or her jurisdiction, has committed a
flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act
on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in
which he or she has a legal duty to act). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the
appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus
without payment of the filing fee.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 12, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Christine E. Kuriyama
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCoy v. Eddins (McCoy v. Eddins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.