McCoy v. Eddins

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 2020·No. SCPW-20-0000560·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 06-NOV-2020 01:09 PM Dkt. 35 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ISAIAH W. MCCOY, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE TODD W. EDDDINS, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

STATE OF HAWAI#I and FRANCIS SEQUEIRA, Warden, O#ahu Community Correctional Center, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CR. NO. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND SECOND AMENDMENT TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Kuriyama, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Isaiah W. McCoy’s

petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on October 29, 2020,

the amendments, and the record, it cannot be said that the

respondent judge committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of

discretion in revoking bail under the specific facts and

circumstances of this case, or that petitioner is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief from this court. See, e.g., HRS

§§ 804-3(b) and 807-7.3; Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412, 557

P.2d 787, 788 (1976). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

habeas corpus and the second amendment to the petition for writ

of habeas corpus are denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 6, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Christine E. Kuriyama

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. Eddins, (haw 2020).

McCoy v. Eddins (McCoy v. Eddins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oili v. Chang
557 P.2d 787 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1976)