McCoy v. Commissioner

4 B.T.A. 1058, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2109
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 25, 1926
DocketDocket No. 6538.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 B.T.A. 1058 (McCoy v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoy v. Commissioner, 4 B.T.A. 1058, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2109 (bta 1926).

Opinion

LaNsdoN :

The Commissioner asserts a deficiency in income tax for the year 1921 in the amount of $151.50. The petitioner alleges that the Commissioner erred in disallowing a loss claimed to have been sustained in the sale of a house. To decide the questions involved, the Board must determine whether the transaction in which the house in controversy was acquired was entered into for profit and, if so, whether the sale of such property in the taxable year resulted in gain or loss.

In the state of the record it is not necessary to determine whether the residence was acquired in a transaction entered into for profit. The property w^as acquired subsequent to March 1, 1913, but the petitioner has furnished no satisfactory evidence of cost. Substantial improvements, estimated to have cost $6,000, were made, but at some date not disclosed by the record. We are not advised as to the nature of the building. Lacking practically all the data necessary to the computation of gain or loss resulting from the sale of a residential property acquired subsequent to March 1, 1913, we are without any basis for disturbing the determination of the Commissioner.

Judgment for the Commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCoy v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 1058 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 1058, 1926 BTA LEXIS 2109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-commissioner-bta-1926.