McCormick v. Fiske

138 Mass. 379, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 201
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 7, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 138 Mass. 379 (McCormick v. Fiske) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCormick v. Fiske, 138 Mass. 379, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 201 (Mass. 1885).

Opinion

C. Allen, J.

Under the Pub. Sts. c. 187, § 4, reenacting the Gen. Sts. c. 146, §§ 5, 6, a writ of error to reverse a judgment may be sued out within six years after the entering of the judgment; or, if an action of contract or writ of scire facias is brought on a judgment, a writ of error may be sued out at any time within six years after the bringing of such action or writ. A want of jurisdiction in the court rendering the judgment is peculiarly a proper matter to be assigned for error. Pub. Sts. c. 187, § 3.

Upon a writ of error, the actual facts upon which the jurisdiction depended inight be shown; and if, upon those facts, the [381]*381court had no jurisdiction, the defendant in the original action would be entitled to a reversal of the judgment. Tilden v. Johnson, 6 Cush. 354, 359. If the facts would warrant it, a writ of error might have been brought in the present case, and an application made for a stay of proceedings in the action upon the judgment, until it could be determined whether or not the judgment should be reversed for error. Since the remedy by writ of error was thus open to the defendant, the defence here set up cannot avail to defeat a domestic judgment. Cook v. Darling, 18 Pick. 393. Finneran v. Leonard, 7 Allen, 54. Hendrick v. Whittemore, 105 Mass. 23.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blatchford v. Goularte
11 Mass. App. Div. 281 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1946)
Leopold Morse Co. v. Jenkins
4 Mass. App. Div. 274 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1939)
Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Smith
70 N.E. 426 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1904)
Hall v. Staples
44 N.E. 351 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. Pederson
60 N.W. 747 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Radclyffe v. Barton
37 N.E. 373 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Adams v. Adams
13 L.R.A. 275 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1891)
McCormick v. Eliot
43 F. 469 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1890)
Needham v. Thayer
18 N.E. 429 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1888)
Fowler v. Brooks
13 A. 417 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1887)
Foley v. City of Haverhill
11 N.E. 554 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Eliot v. McCormick
10 N.E. 705 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
Kittredge v. Martin
6 N.E. 95 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 Mass. 379, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccormick-v-fiske-mass-1885.