Kittredge v. Martin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Kittredge v. Martin

6 N.E. 95, 141 Mass. 410, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 218

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 31, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 6 N.E. 95 (Kittredge v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kittredge v. Martin, 6 N.E. 95, 141 Mass. 410, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 218 (Mass. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

All the grounds upon which the defendant objects to the validity of the judgment upon which the action is brought are proper matters to be assigned for error in a writ of error upon the judgment; and are not matters to be averred and proved in defence of an action upon a domestic judgment.

The precise point is decided in McCormick v. Fiske, 138 Mass. 379, which cannot be distinguished from the case at bar.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

W. Allen, J.

All the grounds upon which the defendant objects to the validity of the judgment upon which the action is brought are proper matters to be assigned for error in a writ of error upon the judgment; and are not matters to be averred and proved in defence of an action upon a domestic judgment.

The precise point is decided in McCormick v. Fiske, 138 Mass. 379, which cannot be distinguished from the case at bar.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.E. 95, 141 Mass. 410, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittredge-v-martin-mass-1886.

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack