McCord v. McGinty
This text of 25 S.E. 667 (McCord v. McGinty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where the vendor of land who retained the title obtained against the vendee a judgment for a balance of the purchase money, and had the land levied on and sold under an execution issued upon such judgment, without first filing and having retíorded a deed conveying the land to the vendee, the sale was void, and one who bid off the land could not be compelled to pay the amount of his bid and accept the sheriff’s deed to the property. See Parks v. Bailey, 22 Ga. 116; Harvill v. Lowe, 47 Ga. 214; Brunson v. Grant et al., 48 Ga. 394; Upchurch v. Lewis et al., 53 Ga. 621.
2. This was a money rule which was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury; and he, under the facts presented, disposed of the case in accordance with the law as above announced. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 S.E. 667, 99 Ga. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccord-v-mcginty-ga-1896.