McConnell v. Federal Election Commission

539 U.S. 974

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McConnell v. Federal Election Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 540 U.S. 93 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided August 4, 2003·No. No. 02-1674; No. 02-1675; No. 02-1676; No. 02-1702; No. 02-1727; No. 02-1733; No. 02-1734; No. 02-1740; No. 02-1747; No. 02-1753; No. 02-1755; No. 02-1756·Published

Opinion

D. C. D. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 911.] Motion for divided argument of plaintiffs in Nos. 02-1674, 02-1727, 02-1733, 02-1734, 02-1753, 02-1755, and 02-1756 granted, except that 60 minutes are allotted for argument on Title I and §213 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, and 50 minutes are allotted on the remainder of the challenged provisions. Motion of Emily Echols et al. and Barret Austin O’Brock for divided argument granted limited to 10 minutes for plaintiffs. Motions for divided argument of plaintiffs in Nos. 02-1675, 02-1740, and 02-1747 denied. Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 539 U.S. 974 (2003).

Pincite

539 U.S. 974 (McConnell v. Federal Election Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.