McConnell v. Federal Election Commission

539 U.S. 911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McConnell v. Federal Election Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 540 U.S. 93
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 5, 2003·No. No. 02-1674; No. 02-1675; No. 02-1676; No. 02-1702; No. 02-1727; No. 02-1733; No. 02-1734; No. 02-1740; No. 02-1747; No. 02-1753; No. 02-1755; No. 02-1756·Published

Opinion

Appeals from D. C. D. C. Probable jurisdiction noted, cases consolidated, and a total of four hours allotted for oral argument. Briefs of the parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court are to address the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements and are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon the parties who were defendants in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, July 8, 2003. Briefs of the parties who were defendants in the District Court are to be filed with -the Clerk of the Court and served upon the parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Tuesday, August 5, 2003. Any reply briefs by parties who were plaintiffs in the District Court are to be filed with the Clerk of the Court and served upon parties who were defendants in the District Court on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, August 21, 2003. Cases set for oral argument at 10:00 a.m., Monday, September 8, 2003. Reported below: 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 and 948.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 539 U.S. 911 (2003).

539 U.S. 911 (McConnell v. Federal Election Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (District of Columbia, 2003)