McConaghy v. Pemberton & Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McConaghy v. Pemberton & Co.

31 A. 996, 168 Pa. 121, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 767

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 13, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 271

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 31 A. 996 (McConaghy v. Pemberton & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McConaghy v. Pemberton & Co., 31 A. 996, 168 Pa. 121, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 767 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The very able argument of the learned counsel for the appellants has failed to convince us of any error in the report of the referee. His report is so well sustained by the treatment he has given of the questions at issue that after a most patient and attentive reading of it in connection with the arguments of counsel, we have reached the conclusion to affirm the judgment upon the findings and conclusions contained in the report.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The very able argument of the learned counsel for the appellants has failed to convince us of any error in the report of the referee. His report is so well sustained by the treatment he has given of the questions at issue that after a most patient and attentive reading of it in connection with the arguments of counsel, we have reached the conclusion to affirm the judgment upon the findings and conclusions contained in the report.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A. 996, 168 Pa. 121, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcconaghy-v-pemberton-co-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack