McComish v. Bennett

653 F.3d 1106
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 2011
Docket10-15165
StatusPublished

This text of 653 F.3d 1106 (McComish v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McComish v. Bennett, 653 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

653 F.3d 1106 (2011)

John McCOMISH; Nancy McLain; Tony Bouie, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Ken BENNETT, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Arizona; Gary Scaramazzo; Royann J. Parker; Jeffrey L. Fairman; Louis Hoffman; Lori S. Daniels, in their official capacities as members of the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, Defendants-Appellants, and
Clean Elections Institute, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor,
v.
Dean Martin; Robert Burns; Rick Murphy; Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC; Arizona Taxpayers Action Committee, agent of Taxpayers Action Committee, Plaintiff-Intervenors-Appellees.
John McComish; Nancy McLain; Tony Bouie, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Ken Bennett, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of Arizona; Gary Scaramazzo; Royann J. Parker; Jeffrey L. Fairman; Louis Hoffman; Lori S. Daniels, in their official capacities as members of the Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission, Defendants, and
Clean Elections Institute, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant,
v.
Dean Martin; Robert Burns; Rick Murphy; Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC; Arizona Taxpayers Action Committee, agent of Taxpayers Action Committee, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees.

Nos. 10-15165, 10-15166.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 10, 2011.

*1107 Clint Bolick, Esqire, Nicholas Constantine Dranias, Esqire, Gustavo Enrique Schneider, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Michael Eugene Bindas, William Randolph Maurer, Jeanette Motee Petersen, Seattle, WA, Timothy D. Keller, Tempe, AZ, for Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees.

Mary O'Grady, James Evans Barton, II, Assistant Attorney General, Timothy A. Nelson, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants-Appellants.

Elisabeth Jill Neubauer, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Stephen M. Hoersting, Counsel, Alexandria, VA, for Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.

Before: ANDREW J. KLEINFELD, A. WALLACE TASHIMA, and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, ___ U.S. ___, 131 S.Ct. 2806, 180 L.Ed.2d 664 (2011), the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McComish v. Bennett
653 F.3d 1106 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F.3d 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccomish-v-bennett-ca9-2011.