McClure v. Department of Transportation

231 S.E.2d 532, 140 Ga. App. 564, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1563
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 24, 1976
Docket53020
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 231 S.E.2d 532 (McClure v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClure v. Department of Transportation, 231 S.E.2d 532, 140 Ga. App. 564, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1563 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

1. The appellee, Department of Transportation, filed a petition and declaration of taking pursuant to Code § 95A-601 et seq., which was served on the appellant-condemnee on April 3, 1975. On May 12, 1975, more than 30 days after service, the appellant filed a notice of appeal under Code § 95A-610. Code § 95A-610 provides that not later than 30 days after service the condemnee may file a notice of appeal where he is dissatisfied with the compensation deposited on the filing of the declaration of taking. Granting extensions of time as permitted under certain circumstances by the Civil Practice Act does not apply to periods of time which are definitely fixed by other statutes. See CPA § 6 (b) (Code Ann. § 81A-106 (b)). Miller v. Ga. Real Estate Comm., 136 Ga. App. 718 (222 SE2d 183). Accordingly, the trial court had no authority or discretion to extend the period of time for filing a notice of appeal. It was not error to dismiss the appellant’s late appeal.

2. Appellant enumerates as error another ruling by the trial court but the record on appeal does not show that this alleged erroneous ruling ever occurred. Appellant has not sought to supplement the record under Code Ann. § 6-805 (f). Therefore, there is nothing for us to review. Allen v. State, 230 Ga. 772 (199 SE2d 246).

*565 Argued November 1, 1976 Decided November 24, 1976. Cochran, Camp & Snipes, Glen E. Stinson, for appellant. Flournoy & Still, Charles A. Evans, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Clark and Stolz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Transportation v. Lajos Szenczi
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
BRYDE Et Al. v. CITY OF ATLANTA.
828 S.E.2d 122 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)
Mary Teresa Duncan v. Etta Dagnan Moreland
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Duncan v. Moreland
751 S.E.2d 139 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Gibson v. Casto
523 S.E.2d 564 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Riddle-Bradley, Inc. v. Riddle
459 S.E.2d 576 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)
Bates & Associates, Inc. v. Department of Transportation
368 S.E.2d 544 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Department of Transportation v. Morris
368 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Walsh v. Hibernia National Bank
288 S.E.2d 29 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Blonder v. Department of Transportation
275 S.E.2d 762 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Department of Transportation v. Rudeseal
276 S.E.2d 52 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Department of Transportation v. Palmer
263 S.E.2d 514 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Department of Transportation v. Brooks
240 S.E.2d 163 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 S.E.2d 532, 140 Ga. App. 564, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclure-v-department-of-transportation-gactapp-1976.