McCloud v. Perez

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 28, 2020·No. 1:17-cv-01827·Unknown

Opinion

AA EN eee + DOCUMEN i . ELECTRON ICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT BOC Ht: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK sILEp-lo8| 202 X DATE PILED. Dw2020) Cornell McCloud, Petitioner, 17 CIVIL 1827 (AJN) -against- JUDGMENT Ada Perez, Respondent, entnetees tenes nen ee nenene nen neneneeeee KX

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated May 27, 2020, Judge Fox's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and Mr. McCioud's petition for habeas corpus is DENIED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York May 28, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: K □□ | J | Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCloud v. Perez, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

McCloud v. Perez (McCloud v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)