McCloskey v. Buckley

172 A.D. 928, 157 N.Y.S. 1134

This text of 172 A.D. 928 (McCloskey v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCloskey v. Buckley, 172 A.D. 928, 157 N.Y.S. 1134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Motion to substitute the administrator granted, should the parties stipulate that the order be entered nunc pro tunc as of a date prior to the hearing of the appeal, and that all sub[929]*929sequent proceedings and papers be .amended accordingly; otherwise, motion denied without prejudice to renewal upon papers showing precisely the date of defendant’s death, the date of the appointment of the administrator, and the dates of the hearing and rehearing of the appeal. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without prejudice to renewal thereof when the administrator is substituted as an appellant. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 A.D. 928, 157 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccloskey-v-buckley-nyappdiv-1916.