McCloskey v. Buckley
172 A.D. 893, 156 N.Y.S. 1132
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1915·Published
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed on reargument, with costs as to defendant Buckley. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ. Judgment and order affirmed on reargument, with costs as to defendant The City of New York. No opinion. Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., dissented upon the ground that said defendant was not liable on the theory of nuisance, which was that of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCloskey v. Buckley, 172 A.D. 893, 156 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
172 A.D. 893 (McCloskey v. Buckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.