Home/Fifth Circuit/McClendon v. City of Columbia

McClendon v. City of Columbia

285 F.3d 1078
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 2002
Docket00-60256
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 285 F.3d 1078 (McClendon v. City of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McClendon v. City of Columbia, 285 F.3d 1078 (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral *1079 argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClendon v. City of Columbia
285 F.3d 1078 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 F.3d 1078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclendon-v-city-of-columbia-ca5-2002.