McClendon v. City of Columbia

Fifth Circuit

McClendon v. City of Columbia

285 F.3d 1078

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2002·No. 00-60256·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral *1079 argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral *1079 argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

McClendon v. City of Columbia, 285 F.3d 1078 (5th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

285 F.3d 1078 (McClendon v. City of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related