McClellan v. Ohio

Supreme Court

McClellan v. Ohio

393 U.S. 929

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 28, 1968

DocketNo. 600

StatusPublished

This text of 393 U.S. 929 (McClellan v. Ohio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McClellan v. Ohio, 393 U.S. 929 (1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Fortas concur in the denial of certiorari, pointing out that the issues under Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, can be decided only upon consideration of a transcript of the voir dire of the jury, which is not now in the record but which can presumably be made available in state or federal collateral proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Fortas concur in the denial of certiorari, pointing out that the issues under Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. S. 510, can be decided only upon consideration of a transcript of the voir dire of the jury, which is not now in the record but which can presumably be made available in state or federal collateral proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 U.S. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcclellan-v-ohio-scotus-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack