McClary v. State

337 S.E.2d 218, 287 S.C. 160, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 520
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 19, 1985·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on a petition for a writ of certiorari after the denial of McClary’s petition for post-conviction relief. The petition is denied.

We take this opportunity to clarify our holding in State v. Woods, 282 S. C. 18, 316 S. E. (2d) 673 (1984). In Woods, we held that our decision in State v. Elmore, 279 S. C. 417, 308 S. E. (2d) 781 (1983), would be applied retroactively. Adopting the reasoning of Shea v. Louisiana, 470 U. S. _, 105 S. Ct. 1065, 84 L.Ed. (2d) 38 (1985), we now hold that Elmore’s retroactive effect will be limited to cases pending on direct appeal and will not apply to collateral attacks on criminal convictions.

Finney, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McClary v. State, 337 S.E.2d 218, 287 S.C. 160, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 520 (S.C. 1985).

337 S.E.2d 218 (McClary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Philip Guderyon
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2025
Yates v. Aiken
349 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)
Truesdale v. Aiken
347 S.E.2d 101 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1986)