McCauley v. State
This text of 168 N.E.2d 843 (McCauley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In each action: Judgment reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, and the judgment of the Court of Claims reinstated. On this record, we are satisfied that a preponderance of the credible evidence favors the determination made in the Court of Claims. So viewed, it cannot reasonably be said in light of all the surrounding circumstances, including the weather and road conditions and the driver’s conduct, that the fatal happening was due to any neglect, failure or omission of the State to perform a duty owed.
Concur: Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Van Voorhis. Chief Judge Desmond dissents in the following opinion in which Judges Burke and Foster concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 N.E.2d 843, 8 N.Y.2d 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccauley-v-state-ny-1960.