McCauley v. Easton School District

19 A. 410, 133 Pa. 493, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 925
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County
DecidedMarch 24, 1890
DocketNo. 303
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 19 A. 410 (McCauley v. Easton School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCauley v. Easton School District, 19 A. 410, 133 Pa. 493, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 925 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1890).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case is ruled by Scranton School District v. Simpson, [495]*495ante, 202, decided at this term, where it was held that, inasmuch as the city treasurer was made, by the act of 1874, ex-officio treasurer of the school district, and took a separate oath, and gave bond to the school district, he held two separate and independent offices, and was entitled to compensation for each, unless his compensation as school treasurer had been taken away by an act of assembly.

The case stated fixes the amount of his compensation, if he is entitled to any, which relieves us of a discussion of that subject.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olcott v. Hoff
181 P. 466 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1919)
Anson v. County of Montgomery
71 Pa. Super. 225 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Pierie v. Philadelphia
21 A. 90 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A. 410, 133 Pa. 493, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccauley-v-easton-school-district-pactcomplnortha-1890.