McCauley v. Easton School District

19 A. 410, 133 Pa. 493, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 925
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County·Decided March 24, 1890·No. No. 303·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This case is ruled by Scranton School District v. Simpson, [495]*495ante, 202, decided at this term, where it was held that, inasmuch as the city treasurer was made, by the act of 1874, ex-officio treasurer of the school district, and took a separate oath, and gave bond to the school district, he held two separate and independent offices, and was entitled to compensation for each, unless his compensation as school treasurer had been taken away by an act of assembly.

The case stated fixes the amount of his compensation, if he is entitled to any, which relieves us of a discussion of that subject.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCauley v. Easton School District, 19 A. 410, 133 Pa. 493, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 925 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1890).

19 A. 410 (McCauley v. Easton School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olcott v. Hoff
181 P. 466 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1919)
Anson v. County of Montgomery
71 Pa. Super. 225 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Pierie v. Philadelphia
21 A. 90 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)