McCarty v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

260 S.W. 6, 202 Ky. 460
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMarch 21, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 260 S.W. 6 (McCarty v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarty v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 260 S.W. 6, 202 Ky. 460 (Ky. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

Whether in this action, brought under the federal Employers’ Liability Act by C. E. McCarty, administrator of Rufus Yaughn, against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, to recover damages for the death of his intestate, the trial court ruled correctly in directing a verdict in favor of the railroad company is the only question presented on this appeal.

The facts are these: The railroad company, an interstate carrier, was engaged in reconstructing a tunnel on its road in Madison county by removing the wooden supports and replacing them with concrete. The tunnel was about six hundred feet long, and two gangs of men, one -working from the north and the other from the south, were employed at the same time. Yaughn was night foreman, and he and his men went to work at three o’clock p. m. and quit at eleven o’clock p. m., except on Saturdays, when they went to work at eleven o’clock a. m. and quit "at six p. m. The wooden lining in the tunnel consisted of a system of bents made of timbers twelve inches square and standing about twenty-four inches apart. -On top of the slanting pieces and level cap were laid two-inch timbers which made a solid covering. To put in the concrete lining it was necessary to remove about two feet of dirt, slate and rock from above the wooden lining. The concrete was mixed and lifted by [462]*462machinery and derrick to the top of the tunnel car about sixteen feet high. The tunnel car was then pushed into the tunnel, where the men were at work, and the materials shoveled from the top of the tunnel car to the scaffold. On Saturday afternoon, McHargue, Taylor and Parrett, three men working under Vaughn, while working in the northern or middle opening, discovered in the roof a rock about three feet wide, two and one-half feet thick and five feet long. Realizing that there was danger of the rock’s falling, the men debated as to whether they should take the rock down or support it with a prop. Finally they yielded to the views of Parrett, who was more experienced in such matters, and concluded to prop the rock, which they did by using a short cross-piece and a leg which rested on the second bent from the concrete. Vaughn was not present when this occurred. On the following Monday, Parrett, McHargue and Taylor ran the tunnel ear into the tunnel and resumed work at the same place. At that time the stone was supported by a short cap. What occurred then is best shown by the testimony of Parrett, Taylor, and McHargue.

On direct examination Parrett’s testimony was as. .follows:

“Q. 70. Then what did you start to do? A. Vaughn came up and— '
Q. 71. From where did he come? A. We were getting ready to knock out the timber and put in ;a long piece.
Q. 73. Well, now, when he came up there, had the short pieces been taken out? A. No, sir. líe came up there and said, ‘I want you to staid both sides,’ and so we knocked out the short timber first to put in the long timber, and he came over there and says, ‘Where are you going to put it?’ and I said, ‘Right under this rock, it is dangerous,’ and he said, ‘Yes, that is the place to put it,’ and McHargue or Taylor said, ‘That rock has dropped down,’ and I said, ‘Yes, it has;’ then he got under tlie rock, picking off some little shales on the slate; he had not been under it over two minutes until the slate fell.”

On cross-examination his evidence was as follows:

“Q. 40. I understood you to say you told Mr. Vaughn that this rock is dangerous? A. He asked me where are you going to put this timber ? I said [463]*463‘right under this rock, where it is dangerous.’ James McHargue or Taylor one said, ‘Yes, that rock has dropped down.’
Q. 41. Were they talking to Mr. Vaughn? A. There were no names called.
Q. How close were you and Mr. Vaughn? A. Four or four and one-half feet.
Q. Was you that close when you called his attention to the rock? A. Yes, sir.
Q. How close were- you to the rock when you were talking about the rock? A. Nearly under the edge of it.
Q. And Mr. Vaughn was within four feet of you? A. Yes, sir.
Q. How close was Taylor to the rock? A. About the same.
Q. All standing four or-five feet of each other, and discussing about the dangerous condition of the rock? A. Yes, sir.
Q. I understand you to say that Mr. Vaughn was standing with one foot on the tunnel car, and one foot on a post, that timber was one of the posts that had formerly propped the side of the tunnel. A. Yes, sir.
Q. Was that a temporary position? A. Yes, sir.
Q. Did he move from that position while he stood there picking shale from this rock? A. Yes, sir.
Q. As you called his attention to this rock being dangerous, he then began to examine it with his hands, did he not? A. Yes, sir.
Q. Did he say anything about its being dangerous or not? A. He said, ‘Yes, that is the place to put the timber.’
Q. Why did yon call his attention to this rock being dangerous? A. It was sticking out and it looked bad.
Q. What was your purpose in telling him about it? A. I wanted to get the timber in before it fell.
Q. Did you have any other purpose in telling him? A. I don’t know as I did.
Q. Did you also tell him for his own purpose, so that he could get out of the way? A. Why, sure.
[464]*464O. Did James McHargue or Taylor, when they . spoke of this rock being dangerous in the presence of Mr. Vaughn, was he close enough to hear what they said? A. Yes, sir.”-

On direct examination Taylor’s evidence was as follows:

“Q. What did be (Vaughn) first say when he came up on that tunnel car? A. I understood him to say for us to work from both sides.
Q. Then after he had told you to go to work on both sides, which side did he go to first to see 'about?' A. I don’t know where he went to, I didn ’t notice.
Q. Was he on your side with you? A. Not then.
Q. Did he come on your side later? A. Yes, sir.
Q. And was killed on your side? A. Yes-, sir.
Q. How long do you think he had been there on the side where you were at work when he was killed? A. Well, I don’t know; of course it seemed like a long time, might not have been so long as it seemed, might not have been over two minutes; of course I don’t know.
Q. After telling you to go to work on both sides, he went somewhere; while he was gone, what was done to that rock? A. We knocked the post ■out.
Q. Who knocked that out? A. I don’t remember.
Q. What were you preparing to do? A. Put long timber in.
Q. Did you have the long timber up there?
A. No, sir.
Q.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisville N. R. Co. v. McCoy
110 S.W.2d 433 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1937)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Gayle
263 S.W. 763 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 S.W. 6, 202 Ky. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarty-v-louisville-nashville-railroad-kyctapp-1924.