McCarthy v. Mooney

49 Ill. 247
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 Ill. 247 (McCarthy v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCarthy v. Mooney, 49 Ill. 247 (Ill. 1868).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Lawrence

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an action for work and labor. It has already been before this court upon a judgment for the plaintiff, and remanded for a second trial, upon the ground that the evidence was insufficient. Since then it has been tried again, and the parties have themselves been sworn, under the recent statute, and the jury rendered another verdict for the plaintiff. As the record is now presented, we cannot say the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. It was for the jury to determine which party to believe.

There was no error in the giving or refusing instructions.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spears v. Spartanburg, Union & Columbia Railroad
11 S.C. 158 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Ill. 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccarthy-v-mooney-ill-1868.