McCarroll v. McCarroll

611 P.2d 205, 96 Nev. 455, 1980 Nev. LEXIS 616
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 22, 1980·No. 10924·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

This action was commenced almost three years after a final decree of divorce had been entered approving an oral agreement for the division of community property. The purpose of the action is to have the former husband’s retirement pension *456 with the U.S. Forest Service declared a community asset and a portion of it awarded to the former wife. The oral agreement for division of community property did not include the pension and no mention was made of it during the divorce action. It is the present contention of the former wife that the former husband was guilty of fraudulent concealment of his retirement pension.

On the record presented, the district court found that the fraud, if any, was intrinsic since the former wife had a fair opportunity to present the claim she is now making to the divorce court. Colby v. Colby, 78 Nev. 150, 369 P.2d 1019 (1962). Consequently, relief is barred by NRCP 60(b). Accordingly, summary judgment was entered for the former husband. We perceive no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCarroll v. McCarroll, 611 P.2d 205, 96 Nev. 455, 1980 Nev. LEXIS 616 (Neb. 1980).

611 P.2d 205 (McCarroll v. McCarroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doan v. Wilkerson
2014 NV 48 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2014)
Williams v. Waldman
836 P.2d 614 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1992)
Amie v. Amie
796 P.2d 233 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)
Gilbert v. State
669 P.2d 699 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1983)
Kramer v. Kramer
616 P.2d 395 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)
Haws v. Haws
615 P.2d 978 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1980)