McCann v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

McCann v. State

169 P.2d 222, 82 Okla. Crim. 304

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 15, 1946

DocketNo. A-10608.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 P.2d 222 (McCann v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCann v. State, 169 P.2d 222, 82 Okla. Crim. 304 (Okla. Ct. App. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

BAREFOOT, J.

Defendant, Virgil McCann, was charged in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county with the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor in Oklahoma county, to wit: Ten pints of tax-paid liquor. He was permitted to withdraw a plea of not guilty, previously entered, and to enter a plea of guilty. He was by the court sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and costs taxed at $24.65, and to serve a term of 60 days in the county jail of Oklahoma county. From this judgment and sentence he has appealed.

This is a companion case of McCann v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 297, 169 P.2d 219, and the same assignment of error is presented in this case.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of McCann v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 297, 169 P.2d 219, the judgment of the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAREFOOT, J.

Defendant, Virgil McCann, was charged in the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county with the crime of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor in Oklahoma county, to wit: Ten pints of tax-paid liquor. He was permitted to withdraw a plea of not guilty, previously entered, and to enter a plea of guilty. He was by the court sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and costs taxed at $24.65, and to serve a term of 60 days in the county jail of Oklahoma county. From this judgment and sentence he has appealed.

This is a companion case of McCann v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 297, 169 P.2d 219, and the same assignment of error is presented in this case.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the case of McCann v. State, 82 Okla. Cr. 297, 169 P.2d 219, the judgment of the court of common pleas of Oklahoma county is affirmed.

JONES, P. J., concurs. DOYLE, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 P.2d 222, 82 Okla. Crim. 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccann-v-state-oklacrimapp-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack