McCann v. Kennedy

44 N.E. 1055, 167 Mass. 23, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 8
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 22, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 44 N.E. 1055 (McCann v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCann v. Kennedy, 44 N.E. 1055, 167 Mass. 23, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 8 (Mass. 1896).

Opinion

Holmes, J.

This is an action for personal injuries, on the ground of negligent superintendence. The plaintiff was at work upon a house in which the defendant was making some changes. He went up a ladder, stepped through a window, and then, in order to avoid a man who was working behind it, stepped to the left upon a joist which had been sawed nearly through for a well-hole, and fell. The plaintiff knew that the customary way to make well-holes was to lay the joists and then cut them out, and, so far as appears, knew where this well-hole would be. It would seem from the plaintiff’s testimony that the joist had been cut very recently. Another witness stated, without contradiction, that he had cut it a moment before the accident, and had gone to get an axe to knock the joist out. The only ground on which the plaintiff could recover is, that while the joist remained it was a trap, and that he ought to have been warned. But the danger was momentary, and it would be impracticable to require employers to warn their men of every such transitory risk when the only thing the men do not know is the precise time when the danger will exist. Flynn v. Campbell, 160 Mass. 128, 130.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conner v. Ogletree
542 S.W.3d 315 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2018)
Cutcliffe v. Harry D. McIntosh Co.
230 Mass. 423 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Lumbert v. Gurney
222 Mass. 235 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Moses v. Sprague-Nugent Co.
106 N.E. 562 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Noonan v. Foley
105 N.E. 558 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Amero v. Adams
104 N.E. 742 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Glavin v. Boston & Maine Railroad
100 N.E. 614 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Gainey v. Peabody
213 Mass. 229 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Murdock v. Paine Furniture Co.
97 N.E. 617 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Proulx v. J. W. Bishop Co.
90 N.E. 539 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Fraser v. Blanchard
73 A. 995 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1909)
Young v. Snell
86 N.E. 282 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Smith v. Boston & Maine Railroad
61 A. 359 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1905)
Chicago Edison Co. v. Davis
93 Ill. App. 284 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1901)
Knight v. Overman Wheel Co.
54 N.E. 890 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
McCoy v. Inhabitants of Westborough
52 N.E. 1064 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Beique v. Hosmer
48 N.E. 338 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Richardson v. Anglo-American Provision Co.
72 Ill. App. 77 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 N.E. 1055, 167 Mass. 23, 1896 Mass. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccann-v-kennedy-mass-1896.