McCallum ex rel. McCallum v. Brodsky

158 So. 2d 589
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 13, 1963·No. No. 3882·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The complaint charged the defendants with the negligent use of a door, in that, while a minor, who with his parents were guests at defendants’ motel, was entering the door the same closed upon his fingers with great force because of a gust of wind. There was no door stop on the door, which opened out, the only device attached to it being a chain which was fastened to the inside top of the door which prevented it from striking the exterior wall of the building. The complaint was dismissed upon motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. See Dolan v. Callender, McAuslan & Troup Co., 26 R.I. 198, 58 A. 655; Ten Broeck v. Deinhardt, 120 App. Div. 473, 105 N.Y.S. 59; Jacob v. City of Pittsburgh, 330 Pa. 587, 198 A. 639; Sockwell v. Lucas & Jenkins Inc., 71 Ga.App. 765, 32 S.E.2d 201; Buzzell v. R. H. White Co., 220 Mass. 129, 107 N.E. 385; 16 A.L.R.2d 1161.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., SHANNON, J., and WARREN, LAMAR, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCallum ex rel. McCallum v. Brodsky, 158 So. 2d 589 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

158 So. 2d 589 (McCallum ex rel. McCallum v. Brodsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De La Rosa v. Gem Paver Systems, Inc.
795 So. 2d 230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Dworkin v. San Juan Intercontinental Hotel Corp.
91 P.R. 567 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1964)