McCall v. Moss

Illinois Supreme Court

McCall v. Moss

100 Ill. 461

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 100 Ill. 461 (McCall v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCall v. Moss, 100 Ill. 461 (Ill. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Sheldon, J.:

This is a motion to discharge a rule to give an additional appeal bond in a larger sum. It is an appeal from the Appellate Court. The circuit court rendered a decree for $36,000. An appeal was taken to the Appellate Court, and the circuit court' required a bond of $40,000. That bond was given. The Appellate Court affirmed the decree. On appeal from the Appellate Court to this court an appeal bond of $300 vfas required. If given, that bond would be sufficient to cover costs in this court, in case we affirmed the judgment of the Appellate Court, and we' understand that this bond for $40,000, given in the circuit court on the appeal to the Appellate Court, would stand as security for the payment of the decree. If so, we think the bond is sufficient in amount. No exception is taken to the sufficiency of the sureties,—it is only as to the amount of the bond.

The rule will be discharged.

Rule discharged,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheldon, J.:

This is a motion to discharge a rule to give an additional appeal bond in a larger sum. It is an appeal from the Appellate Court. The circuit court rendered a decree for $36,000. An appeal was taken to the Appellate Court, and the circuit court' required a bond of $40,000. That bond was given. The Appellate Court affirmed the decree. On appeal from the Appellate Court to this court an appeal bond of $300 vfas required. If given, that bond would be sufficient to cover costs in this court, in case we affirmed the judgment of the Appellate Court, and we' understand that this bond for $40,000, given in the circuit court on the appeal to the Appellate Court, would stand as security for the payment of the decree. If so, we think the bond is sufficient in amount. No exception is taken to the sufficiency of the sureties,—it is only as to the amount of the bond.

The rule will be discharged.

Rule discharged,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 Ill. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccall-v-moss-ill-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack