Ennor v. Galena & Southern Wisconsin Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Ennor v. Galena & Southern Wisconsin Railroad

104 Ill. 103

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 104 Ill. 103 (Ennor v. Galena & Southern Wisconsin Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ennor v. Galena & Southern Wisconsin Railroad, 104 Ill. 103 (Ill. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Sheldon, J.:

This motion seems to be made on a misapprehension as to the effect of the appeal bond given on the appeal from the circuit court to the Appellate Court, standing as a security for the amount of the judgment appealed from. The adequacy of that bond, as respects the amount of the penalty in which it is given, does not seem to be called in question, or its sufficiency in any other respect. The bond given on the appeal to this court is in a sum sufficient to cover the costs in this court, and in case of an affirmance of the judgment of the Appellate Court, the bond given in the circuit court will stand as security for the payment of the judgment. So the appellee has ample security for his judgment, and the costs, in the event of his having to resort to such security, and that is all he can require. A similar question was before us in McCall v. Moss, 100 Ill. 461. The motion will he denied.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheldon, J.:

This motion seems to be made on a misapprehension as to the effect of the appeal bond given on the appeal from the circuit court to the Appellate Court, standing as a security for the amount of the judgment appealed from. The adequacy of that bond, as respects the amount of the penalty in which it is given, does not seem to be called in question, or its sufficiency in any other respect. The bond given on the appeal to this court is in a sum sufficient to cover the costs in this court, and in case of an affirmance of the judgment of the Appellate Court, the bond given in the circuit court will stand as security for the payment of the judgment. So the appellee has ample security for his judgment, and the costs, in the event of his having to resort to such security, and that is all he can require. A similar question was before us in McCall v. Moss, 100 Ill. 461. The motion will he denied.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 Ill. 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ennor-v-galena-southern-wisconsin-railroad-ill-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack