McCabe v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

McCabe v. Commissioner

23 B.T.A. 1005, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1796

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1931

DocketDocket No. 35231.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 B.T.A. 1005 (McCabe v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCabe v. Commissioner, 23 B.T.A. 1005, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1796 (bta 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

[1006]*1006OPINION.

Arundell:

As set forth in our preliminary statement, counsel for respondent has conceded that three-fifths of the profit realized on the sale in 1923 is properly taxable to the three children who had attained majority prior to the time of the sale. In view of this concession, made at the hearing and accepted by counsel for petitioner, there is left for us to determine only to whom the remaining two-fifths of the profit is taxable. Respondent contends that this two-fifths is taxable to the fiduciary. We think the respondent’s position is correct. The profit realized was not ordinary income distributable to the widow and the minor child, but was a realization of increase in value of the corpus which is not distributable until the termination of the trust. Gibbons v. Mahon, 135 U. S. 549; Henrietta Bendheim, 8 B. T. A. 158.

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1006]*1006OPINION.

Arundell:

As set forth in our preliminary statement, counsel for respondent has conceded that three-fifths of the profit realized on the sale in 1923 is properly taxable to the three children who had attained majority prior to the time of the sale. In view of this concession, made at the hearing and accepted by counsel for petitioner, there is left for us to determine only to whom the remaining two-fifths of the profit is taxable. Respondent contends that this two-fifths is taxable to the fiduciary. We think the respondent’s position is correct. The profit realized was not ordinary income distributable to the widow and the minor child, but was a realization of increase in value of the corpus which is not distributable until the termination of the trust. Gibbons v. Mahon, 135 U. S. 549; Henrietta Bendheim, 8 B. T. A. 158.

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 B.T.A. 1005, 1931 BTA LEXIS 1796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccabe-v-commissioner-bta-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack