McBrien v. United States
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) KAREN McBRIEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-2432 (RWR) ) UNITED STATES et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Karen McBrien, proceeding pro se, has filed a
complaint against the United States and numerous other defendants
generally based on the same events complained of in McBrien v.
FBI et al., Civil Action No. 09-197 (CKK), which was dismissed as
frivolous because the events alleged in the complaint constituted
“fantastic or delusional scenarios,” see id., 2009 WL 260043, at
*1 (D.D.C. February 3, 2009), and McBrien v. United States et
al., Civil Action No. 09-1527 (RBW), which was dismissed for
presenting “fantastic and delusional scenarios of a nationwide
conspiracy involving [McBrien’s] relatives, former relatives, and
numerous state and federal agencies who work in concert to spy
on, control, injure, and trick the plaintiff.” Id., 2009 WL
2525152, at *1 (D.D.C. August 13, 2009). Because a complaint may
be dismissed if it is frivolous or fails to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted, see Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S.
25, 31-33 (1992); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C. -2-
Cir. 2009); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)(B), this complaint also
warrants dismissal as frivolous. An appropriate order
accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
SIGNED this 25th day of January, 2010.
/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McBrien v. United States (McBrien v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.