McBrien v. United States

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJanuary 25, 2010
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-2432
StatusPublished

This text of McBrien v. United States (McBrien v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McBrien v. United States, (D.D.C. 2010).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) KAREN McBRIEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-2432 (RWR) ) UNITED STATES et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Karen McBrien, proceeding pro se, has filed a

complaint against the United States and numerous other defendants

generally based on the same events complained of in McBrien v.

FBI et al., Civil Action No. 09-197 (CKK), which was dismissed as

frivolous because the events alleged in the complaint constituted

“fantastic or delusional scenarios,” see id., 2009 WL 260043, at

*1 (D.D.C. February 3, 2009), and McBrien v. United States et

al., Civil Action No. 09-1527 (RBW), which was dismissed for

presenting “fantastic and delusional scenarios of a nationwide

conspiracy involving [McBrien’s] relatives, former relatives, and

numerous state and federal agencies who work in concert to spy

on, control, injure, and trick the plaintiff.” Id., 2009 WL

2525152, at *1 (D.D.C. August 13, 2009). Because a complaint may

be dismissed if it is frivolous or fails to state a claim upon

which relief can be granted, see Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S.

25, 31-33 (1992); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C. -2-

Cir. 2009); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1)(B), this complaint also

warrants dismissal as frivolous. An appropriate order

accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SIGNED this 25th day of January, 2010.

/s/ RICHARD W. ROBERTS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Denton v. Hernandez
504 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1992)
Tooley v. Napolitano
556 F.3d 836 (D.C. Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
McBrien v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcbrien-v-united-states-dcd-2010.