McAvoy v. Di Leo

43 Misc. 2d 164, 250 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1848
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided April 22, 1964·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Section 205-a of the General Municipal Law is not available to the plaintiffs in the situation here disclosed.

The order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the second cause of action in each complaint should be unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted.

Concur — Benjamin, Gulotta and McDonald, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAvoy v. Di Leo, 43 Misc. 2d 164, 250 N.Y.S.2d 444, 1964 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

43 Misc. 2d 164 (McAvoy v. Di Leo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruotolo v. State
151 Misc. 2d 820 (New York State Court of Claims, 1991)
Kenavan v. City of New York
517 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Kenavan v. City of New York
120 A.D.2d 24 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Traver v. City of Saratoga Springs
122 Misc. 2d 63 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Donovan v. Rapid Ray's Printing & Copying, Inc.
93 Misc. 2d 750 (Buffalo City Court, 1978)
Gerhart v. City of New York
56 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)