McAteer v. 40 Park Ave., LLC

87 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2025 NY Slip Op 52000(U)
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 2025
Docket571288/25
StatusUnpublished

This text of 87 Misc. 3d 136(A) (McAteer v. 40 Park Ave., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McAteer v. 40 Park Ave., LLC, 87 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2025 NY Slip Op 52000(U) (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

McAteer v 40 Park Ave., LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 52000(U)) [*1]
McAteer v 40 Park Ave., LLC
2025 NY Slip Op 52000(U) [87 Misc 3d 136(A)]
Decided on December 15, 2025
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on December 15, 2025
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Brigantti, J.P., Perez, Alpert, JJ.
571288/25

Ingrid McAteer, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

40 Park Avenue, LLC, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of Small Claims Part of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Betty Lugo-Martinez, J.), entered on or about June 27, 2025, after trial, in favor of plaintiff in the principal amount of $9,450.50, and dismissed the counterclaim.

Per Curiam.

Judgment (Betty Lugo-Martinez, J.), entered on or about June 27, 2025, modified, by reducing plaintiff's recovery to the principal sum of $4,725.25, as modified, judgment affirmed, without costs.

The trial court achieved "substantial justice" consistent with substantive law principles (see CCA §§ 1804, 1807; see also Williams v Roper, 269 AD2d 125, 126 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 898 [2000]) in resolving the liability aspects of this small claims action in plaintiff's favor. A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the finding that defendant-landlord breached the warranty of habitability due to the presence of bedbugs in plaintiff-tenant's apartment over a nearly five-month period of time, a condition serious enough to warrant two separate violations to be issued by the Department of Housing Preservation and Development (see Park W. Mgt. Corp. v Mitchell, 47 NY2d 316, 329 [1979]). Although defendant responded promptly, it ultimately took five months to abate the condition.

However, the record and the ends of "substantial justice" (CCA 1807) support a damage award of no greater than $4,725.25, an amount consistent with a 50% rent abatement (see Andrew Scherer & Hon. Fern Fisher Residential Landlord Tenant L. in NY § 12:109 [October 2025 update]; Assoc. v CW, 24 Misc 3d 1225[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 51617[U] [Civil Ct, Bronx County 2009][50% abatement for severe bedbug infestation where landlord responded promptly but ultimately failed to remedy the situation]; Ludlow Props., LLC v Young, 4 Misc 3d 515, 520 [Civil Court, NY County 2004 [45% rent abatement from bedbugs]), since, among other things, plaintiff remained in possession at all times.

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: December 15, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hofgur LLC v. D.A.
2026 NY Slip Op 50273(U) (NYC Civil Court, Queens, 2026)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2025 NY Slip Op 52000(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcateer-v-40-park-ave-llc-nyappterm-2025.