McAlester v. State

298 S.W.3d 598, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1780, 2009 WL 4782388
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 2009·No. WD 69878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Alphonso McAlester appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. McAlester sought to vacate his conviction and five year sentence for second-degree statutory rape. On appeal, he contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he did not waive his right to self-representation by pleading guilty and his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary because had he been permitted to represent himself, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have gone to trial.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAlester v. State, 298 S.W.3d 598, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1780, 2009 WL 4782388 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

298 S.W.3d 598 (McAlester v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kidd v. State
298 S.W.3d 598 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)